<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Telling stories to &#8220;work the past&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.informl.com/2009/02/17/telling-stories-to-work-the-past/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.informl.com/2009/02/17/telling-stories-to-work-the-past/</link>
	<description>from Jay Cross and Internet Time Group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:02:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John D. Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.informl.com/2009/02/17/telling-stories-to-work-the-past/comment-page-1/#comment-2104</link>
		<dc:creator>John D. Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 22:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informl.com/?p=1781#comment-2104</guid>
		<description>I read this book -- very slowly -- so I really enjoyed it.  In a way I think that Linde&#039;s non-prescriptive stance is part of the point.  It&#039;s SO tempting to jump in and tell people how to do things!  Think of what a big industry there was instructing people how to instruct people back in the day when the Institute for Research on Learning was studying that (pre-YouTube) insurance company.  Who care what their prescriptions were?  And yet, Linde&#039;s careful observations suggest how things actually work: who tells stories, about what, when, for what purpose.  AND who doesn&#039;t tell stories and why.  AND what stories are not told and why.

I think that the effect of YouTube on an organization merits a careful, dispassionate look but it certainly doesn&#039;t invalidate the insights that Lidne brings out.  Send me your copy if you don&#039;t want it: I&#039;ve got several people I want to foist it on.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read this book &#8212; very slowly &#8212; so I really enjoyed it.  In a way I think that Linde&#8217;s non-prescriptive stance is part of the point.  It&#8217;s SO tempting to jump in and tell people how to do things!  Think of what a big industry there was instructing people how to instruct people back in the day when the Institute for Research on Learning was studying that (pre-YouTube) insurance company.  Who care what their prescriptions were?  And yet, Linde&#8217;s careful observations suggest how things actually work: who tells stories, about what, when, for what purpose.  AND who doesn&#8217;t tell stories and why.  AND what stories are not told and why.</p>
<p>I think that the effect of YouTube on an organization merits a careful, dispassionate look but it certainly doesn&#8217;t invalidate the insights that Lidne brings out.  Send me your copy if you don&#8217;t want it: I&#8217;ve got several people I want to foist it on.  <img src='http://www.informl.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guide to Study &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Telling stories to “work the past”</title>
		<link>http://www.informl.com/2009/02/17/telling-stories-to-work-the-past/comment-page-1/#comment-1943</link>
		<dc:creator>Guide to Study &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Telling stories to “work the past”</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 04:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informl.com/?p=1781#comment-1943</guid>
		<description>[...] Source:  admin [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source:  admin [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
