Done!Comments on: The points of Tweets
http://www.informl.com/2008/09/27/the-points-of-tweets/
from Jay Cross and Internet Time GroupWed, 10 Mar 2010 00:02:33 +0000http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1hourly1By: twitter hater
http://www.informl.com/2008/09/27/the-points-of-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-2561
twitter haterSat, 22 Aug 2009 21:10:14 +0000http://informl.com/?p=1380#comment-2561I'm an artist and student of visual arts and was drawn here in search of Seurat images. This is an interesting analogy about the overarching significance of twittering. It made briefly consider signing up...I’m an artist and student of visual arts and was drawn here in search of Seurat images. This is an interesting analogy about the overarching significance of twittering. It made briefly consider signing up…
]]>
By: EDITing in the Dark » Throwing around Bricks… in the dark… are there any glass houses?
http://www.informl.com/2008/09/27/the-points-of-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-1241
EDITing in the Dark » Throwing around Bricks… in the dark… are there any glass houses?Tue, 21 Oct 2008 22:31:35 +0000http://informl.com/?p=1380#comment-1241[...] individuals, you can see a “grand narrative” emerge from the myriad of points ala pointillism. This seems to have certainly been happening with the Canadian and US elections. A question gets [...][...] individuals, you can see a “grand narrative” emerge from the myriad of points ala pointillism. This seems to have certainly been happening with the Canadian and US elections. A question gets [...]
]]>By: bob ashley
http://www.informl.com/2008/09/27/the-points-of-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-1242
bob ashleyWed, 01 Oct 2008 03:40:57 +0000http://informl.com/?p=1380#comment-1242I meant latter where I said former. Whoops.
bobI meant latter where I said former. Whoops.
bob
]]>By: bob ashley
http://www.informl.com/2008/09/27/the-points-of-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-1243
bob ashleyWed, 01 Oct 2008 03:40:07 +0000http://informl.com/?p=1380#comment-1243This is a useful metaphor. Thanks for describing it more fully. I'd suggest that while the pointilist cumulative power enables an intelligible image to appear, it is motivated. The fact that we have a diverse set of metaphors to describe Twitter, I think, lends credence to a comparison with the Rorschach Test (inkblot), which is unmotivated. Where the former falls down, of course, is that the inkblot is an amorphous or homogenized picture, lacking the communicative power of the dot mob.
Maybe a pointilist rorschach?
bobThis is a useful metaphor. Thanks for describing it more fully. I’d suggest that while the pointilist cumulative power enables an intelligible image to appear, it is motivated. The fact that we have a diverse set of metaphors to describe Twitter, I think, lends credence to a comparison with the Rorschach Test (inkblot), which is unmotivated. Where the former falls down, of course, is that the inkblot is an amorphous or homogenized picture, lacking the communicative power of the dot mob.
Maybe a pointilist rorschach?
bob
]]>By: Beth Kanter
http://www.informl.com/2008/09/27/the-points-of-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-1236
Beth KanterTue, 30 Sep 2008 15:46:34 +0000http://informl.com/?p=1380#comment-1236I love this. Thanks. Also extend this to looking at stream from twitter search and looking for patterns.I love this. Thanks. Also extend this to looking at stream from twitter search and looking for patterns.
]]>By: LaDonna Coy
http://www.informl.com/2008/09/27/the-points-of-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-1238
LaDonna CoyMon, 29 Sep 2008 16:22:54 +0000http://informl.com/?p=1380#comment-1238This is an excellent analogy and visual for thinking about and describing Twitter - thank you Jay. It strikes me that with some of the offshoot applications like http://search.twitter.com/ you can even gaze at a particular portion of the "twitter painting" so to speak, a subset of the larger conversation and yet still at a enough distance to see patterns emerge.This is an excellent analogy and visual for thinking about and describing Twitter – thank you Jay. It strikes me that with some of the offshoot applications like http://search.twitter.com/ you can even gaze at a particular portion of the “twitter painting” so to speak, a subset of the larger conversation and yet still at a enough distance to see patterns emerge.
]]>By: Deepa
http://www.informl.com/2008/09/27/the-points-of-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-1237
DeepaSun, 28 Sep 2008 15:16:14 +0000http://informl.com/?p=1380#comment-1237As an artist and a twitterer, I can really appreciate this perspective. Thank you for a lovely post! and thanks to @jeanlucr for bringing it to my notice.As an artist and a twitterer, I can really appreciate this perspective. Thank you for a lovely post! and thanks to @jeanlucr for bringing it to my notice.
]]>By: Writer2
http://www.informl.com/2008/09/27/the-points-of-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-1239
Writer2Sun, 28 Sep 2008 12:05:35 +0000http://informl.com/?p=1380#comment-1239Life, too, is like pointillism.Life, too, is like pointillism.
]]>By: John Hathaway
http://www.informl.com/2008/09/27/the-points-of-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-1240
John HathawaySun, 28 Sep 2008 10:55:39 +0000http://informl.com/?p=1380#comment-1240This is becoming a popular analogy for Twitter and I think it's quite accurate, although Twitter also spreads the dots out over time: it's like watching a pointillist painting as it's being painted. It's a big reason why it is hard for people to understand the value of Twitter until they've experienced it for a while. I think you need to actively participate for a week or so to have enough dots to see the picture.This is becoming a popular analogy for Twitter and I think it’s quite accurate, although Twitter also spreads the dots out over time: it’s like watching a pointillist painting as it’s being painted. It’s a big reason why it is hard for people to understand the value of Twitter until they’ve experienced it for a while. I think you need to actively participate for a week or so to have enough dots to see the picture.
]]>