Done! Comments on: The points of Tweets http://www.informl.com/2008/09/27/the-points-of-tweets/ from Jay Cross and Internet Time Group Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:02:33 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: twitter hater http://www.informl.com/2008/09/27/the-points-of-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-2561 twitter hater Sat, 22 Aug 2009 21:10:14 +0000 http://informl.com/?p=1380#comment-2561 I'm an artist and student of visual arts and was drawn here in search of Seurat images. This is an interesting analogy about the overarching significance of twittering. It made briefly consider signing up... I’m an artist and student of visual arts and was drawn here in search of Seurat images. This is an interesting analogy about the overarching significance of twittering. It made briefly consider signing up…

]]>
By: EDITing in the Dark » Throwing around Bricks… in the dark… are there any glass houses? http://www.informl.com/2008/09/27/the-points-of-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-1241 EDITing in the Dark » Throwing around Bricks… in the dark… are there any glass houses? Tue, 21 Oct 2008 22:31:35 +0000 http://informl.com/?p=1380#comment-1241 [...] individuals, you can see a “grand narrative” emerge from the myriad of points ala pointillism. This seems to have certainly been happening with the Canadian and US elections. A question gets [...] [...] individuals, you can see a “grand narrative” emerge from the myriad of points ala pointillism. This seems to have certainly been happening with the Canadian and US elections. A question gets [...]

]]>
By: bob ashley http://www.informl.com/2008/09/27/the-points-of-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-1242 bob ashley Wed, 01 Oct 2008 03:40:57 +0000 http://informl.com/?p=1380#comment-1242 I meant latter where I said former. Whoops. bob I meant latter where I said former. Whoops.

bob

]]>
By: bob ashley http://www.informl.com/2008/09/27/the-points-of-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-1243 bob ashley Wed, 01 Oct 2008 03:40:07 +0000 http://informl.com/?p=1380#comment-1243 This is a useful metaphor. Thanks for describing it more fully. I'd suggest that while the pointilist cumulative power enables an intelligible image to appear, it is motivated. The fact that we have a diverse set of metaphors to describe Twitter, I think, lends credence to a comparison with the Rorschach Test (inkblot), which is unmotivated. Where the former falls down, of course, is that the inkblot is an amorphous or homogenized picture, lacking the communicative power of the dot mob. Maybe a pointilist rorschach? bob This is a useful metaphor. Thanks for describing it more fully. I’d suggest that while the pointilist cumulative power enables an intelligible image to appear, it is motivated. The fact that we have a diverse set of metaphors to describe Twitter, I think, lends credence to a comparison with the Rorschach Test (inkblot), which is unmotivated. Where the former falls down, of course, is that the inkblot is an amorphous or homogenized picture, lacking the communicative power of the dot mob.

Maybe a pointilist rorschach?

bob

]]>
By: Beth Kanter http://www.informl.com/2008/09/27/the-points-of-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-1236 Beth Kanter Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:46:34 +0000 http://informl.com/?p=1380#comment-1236 I love this. Thanks. Also extend this to looking at stream from twitter search and looking for patterns. I love this. Thanks. Also extend this to looking at stream from twitter search and looking for patterns.

]]>
By: LaDonna Coy http://www.informl.com/2008/09/27/the-points-of-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-1238 LaDonna Coy Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:22:54 +0000 http://informl.com/?p=1380#comment-1238 This is an excellent analogy and visual for thinking about and describing Twitter - thank you Jay. It strikes me that with some of the offshoot applications like http://search.twitter.com/ you can even gaze at a particular portion of the "twitter painting" so to speak, a subset of the larger conversation and yet still at a enough distance to see patterns emerge. This is an excellent analogy and visual for thinking about and describing Twitter – thank you Jay. It strikes me that with some of the offshoot applications like http://search.twitter.com/ you can even gaze at a particular portion of the “twitter painting” so to speak, a subset of the larger conversation and yet still at a enough distance to see patterns emerge.

]]>
By: Deepa http://www.informl.com/2008/09/27/the-points-of-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-1237 Deepa Sun, 28 Sep 2008 15:16:14 +0000 http://informl.com/?p=1380#comment-1237 As an artist and a twitterer, I can really appreciate this perspective. Thank you for a lovely post! and thanks to @jeanlucr for bringing it to my notice. As an artist and a twitterer, I can really appreciate this perspective. Thank you for a lovely post! and thanks to @jeanlucr for bringing it to my notice.

]]>
By: Writer2 http://www.informl.com/2008/09/27/the-points-of-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-1239 Writer2 Sun, 28 Sep 2008 12:05:35 +0000 http://informl.com/?p=1380#comment-1239 Life, too, is like pointillism. Life, too, is like pointillism.

]]>
By: John Hathaway http://www.informl.com/2008/09/27/the-points-of-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-1240 John Hathaway Sun, 28 Sep 2008 10:55:39 +0000 http://informl.com/?p=1380#comment-1240 This is becoming a popular analogy for Twitter and I think it's quite accurate, although Twitter also spreads the dots out over time: it's like watching a pointillist painting as it's being painted. It's a big reason why it is hard for people to understand the value of Twitter until they've experienced it for a while. I think you need to actively participate for a week or so to have enough dots to see the picture. This is becoming a popular analogy for Twitter and I think it’s quite accurate, although Twitter also spreads the dots out over time: it’s like watching a pointillist painting as it’s being painted. It’s a big reason why it is hard for people to understand the value of Twitter until they’ve experienced it for a while. I think you need to actively participate for a week or so to have enough dots to see the picture.

]]>