Learnscape Architecture

Industrial age workers used machinery to manufacture objects in factories. Now, knowledge workers create value, not on the factory floor, but in what I call a learnscape. A learnscape is the platform where knowledge workers collaborate, solve problems, converse, share ideas, brainstorm, learn, relate to others, talk, explain, communicate, conceptualize, tell stories, help one another, teach, serve customers, keep up to date, meet one another, forge partnerships, build communities, and distribute information. Learnscapes are where and how modern work is performed-including workplace learning.

Natural Pathways

Corporate learning is a continuous, never-ending process. People learn to do their work in small chunks: a tip from a pal, an “ah-ha moment” after trying something new, a factoid from Wikipedia or Google, a glimpse of someone doing something well, or a story told over lunch. But training departments rely on offering workshops and courses, and CLOs fixate on “learning management systems.” These event-driven things are necessary, but they are a small part of improving organizational learning and performance. Rather than investing in new content and control systems, learning leaders will get a higher return from nurturing the natural pathways to learning that already exist in their organizations.

Training events are less important than ever. Today, greater leverage comes from building on-going, largely self-sustaining learning processes such as subscriptions to keep up-to-date technically, persistent online meeting rooms for collaboration, and knowledge bases that support self-service learning. This process orientation focuses on an organization’s architecture for learning, a platform that is a level above its training programs and regulated events. Learning architecture is the foundation for learning that is spontaneous, serendipitous, drip-fed, and mentored—as well as for the formal training that will always be with us.

Learning is the Work

Corporate learning used to be based on the proposition that knowing how people did things in the past was adequate preparation for doing well in the present. This worked when there was generally one way to do a task, and it remained the same for decades. Today, incessant change is baked into everything. About all we can say is that the future won’t be like the past. The focus of learning must shift from what used to work to what works now.

High-quality learning is that which enables a worker to turn in an exemplary performance. This is a moving target. Pragmatic learning involves continually acquiring knowledge, figuring out how to do things, unlearning concepts that have become obsolete, and keeping abreast of change. The product of learning is not something a person receives a certificate for; the true outcome of learning is successful adaptation to the ever-changing environment.

Knowledge Work

In the industrial era, workers operated machinery to produce goods. You could see what they were doing and touch the goods they produced. Time-and-motion studies identified the one best way to do a job; training taught workers how to do it. Successful workers followed instructions. “You’re not paid to think.” Outcomes were predictable. Work was mechanical.

Today, workers apply knowledge to deliver services. You can’t see most of what they’re doing, and their output is largely intangible. There’s always a better way to do a job; learning stretches minds to cope with new situations. Successful knowledge workers are rewarded for innovation and ingenuity. These workers are paid to think. Change is rampant and unpredictable.

Not so long ago, knowledge itself was thought to reside in people’s heads. The new view is that knowledge is collective intelligence, a shared consensual reality that lives among us rather than inside us. We aren’t mere consumers of knowledge; we’re contributors as well. Knowledge work is social. More than just a repository for content, learnscapes are necessary platforms for sharing, relationship-building, and making meaning.

Role of the Architect

Gardeners don’t control plants; managers don’t control people. You can’t make a plant fit into a landscape or a person fit into an organization; you can only prepare an environment to make this a more likely outcome. Our role as learning professionals is to shape that environment, provide nutrients for growth, and let nature take its course.

Learnscape architects nurture organizations to get things done as simply and naturally as possible. Diverse elements, held in equilibrium, make for robust, thriving, vibrant organizations. Learnscapes share many characteristics of the Web: simplicity, clarity, user-centricity, restraint, and attention to detail.

Self-service workers connect to one another, to ongoing flows of information and work, to their teams and organizations, to their customers and markets, not to mention their families and friends because they can easily navigate networks of “small pieces, loosely joined,” the conventions they know from the Internet.

The Business Argument

The landscape architect’s goal is to conceptualize a harmonious, unified, pleasing garden that makes the most of the site at hand. The learnscape architect strives to create a learning environment that increases the organization’s longevity and health and the individual learner’s happiness and well-being.

That’s not enough to win the learnscape architect a commission. Harmony is a tough sell in a topsy-turvy business climate.

Business leaders will only support investing in learnscape architecture when they consider its tangible outcomes, among them:

  • building productive two-way relationships with customers
  • fostering a culture of continuous improvement
  • facilitating teamwork, collaboration, and joint problem-solving
  • increasing corporate responsiveness to change
  • cutting superfluous email and bureaucratic bloat
  • strengthening bonds with all stakeholders
  • attracting inquisitive, self-motivated talent
  • keeping abreast of new developments in industry and markets
  • fostering self-service learning without boundaries
  • replacing antiquated control systems with enlightened self-regulation

A few organizations have adopted the approach of learnscape architecture although it goes by different names. I am developing a pattern language of learning archetypes to make it easier for organizations to assemble optimal learnscapes. This work is not yet finished nor do I expect it ever will be. In my next article, I’ll explore some of the specifics of putting this approach to work.

About the Author
Jay Cross is the founder of Internet Time Group LLC. He is a champion of informal learning, Web 2.0, and systems thinking. He has challenged conventional wisdom about how adults learn since designing the first business degree program offered by the University of Phoenix. His latest book, Learnscape Architecture: Getting Things Done in Organizations, is being released in late August 2008. Progress reports will be available at jaycross.com

Enterprise learning mash-up

An organization’s learnscape is a mash-up of business needs, networks, learning, environmental change, internet values, web tech, and unlearning. (Click for larger image.)

Join me and some pals for a conversation about Enterprise Learning. (It’s a platform, not a program.)

Thursday, September 11, 2008. 10:30 Pacific, 1:30 Eastern; 17:30 GMT
Conference Dial-in Number: (712) 432-1601. Participant Access Code: 391096#
Hint: Save phone charges by using Skype to call in.

Thirty minutes of give and take. (Bring your issues.) Die-hards may keep the conversation going for a full hour.
Sessions are recorded. Invite your friends and colleagues to join us. When you arrive, mute your damn phone.
Reference page

What’s Facebook got to do with it?

Facebook is a runaway success but I’ve never been much of a fan. It struck me as streams of trivia. Another intrusion into my time for reflection on loftier issues. This post by JP Rangaswami opened my eyes as to how Facebook can improve learning in the enterprise.

In large measure, we learn our jobs by watching and copying how other people do theirs. We mimic.

Facebook and similar tools make it easier to watch what others are doing. As JP writes,

It could be as simple as: What does my boss do? Whom does she talk to? What are her surfing habits like? Whom does she treat as high priority in terms of communications received? What applications does she use? Which ones does she not use? When she has a particular Ghost to deal with, which particular Ghostbuster does she call?

What makes her tick. That’s what they want to understand, that’s what they want to learn from.

In the past, the corporate learning function attempted to lift important lessons out of the flow and offer them up in concentrated form. In a well-functioning learnscape, workers can tap directly into the flow itself. They can drink the bouillon rather than choke on a diet of bouillon cubes. Think of it as cognitive apprenticeship based on peering over your mentor’s shoulder.

This type of learning is not just about subordinate-to-boss and succession-plan related, it is also about newbie-to-old-hand, mentored-to-mentor. A picture of the activities and relationships and paths followed, a “let me show you” session, is worth a thousand “let me tell you” sessions.

More and more, knowledge management is going to be about reducing the cost of, and simplifying the process for, letting someone watch what you do. Nonintrusively. Time-shifted. Place-shifted. Searchable. Archivable. Retrievable.

That’s how we are going to create the right learning environments. I think Facebook has the tools to capture much of this in the nonintrusive time-shifted place-shifted shareable way. Let the patterns emerge. Share the patterns. Get inside people’s heads

Learning takes brains

Enterprise learnscape architects are opportunists. Perhaps “holistic” is a more polite way to put it. When you look at corporate learning from an ecological perspective, you take advantage of whatever works so long as it’s cost-effective. If tweaking the office lighting improves performance, I’m all for it. If something improves the learning capacity of individuals, that’s game, too. Which brings me to brains.

Fit brains learn better.

I just received the SharpBrains Fitness Newsletter from my pal Alvaro Fernandez. Alvaro is a former McKinsey consultant who helped turn around several major eLearning companies before founding his successful venture in cognitive health and fitness research.  SharpBrains  maintains a searchable index of 600+ articles on brain fitness and research.  A few relevant examples: 

Should Social-Emotional Learning Be Part of Academic Curriculum?: It is clear by now that our brains are more than cognitive machines. For example, emotions can either enhance or inhibit our ability to learn. Daniel Goleman explores the implications of “new studies that reveal how teaching kids to be emotionally and socially competent boost their academic achievement.” Brought to you in partnership with Greater Good Magazine.

Retain older workers beyond retirement: BusinessWeek covers a best practice in a topic of growing importance: how large companies, such as American Express, can retain older workers in productive ways beyond a set arbitrary retirement age. As Dr. Art Kramer told us recently, “as a society, it is a massive waste of talent not to ensure older adults remain active and productive.”

Exercising the body is exercising the mind: Dr. Adria Preda explains research conducted at Gage laboratory that supports the merits for physical exercise to be recognized as a form of brain exercise too.

What You Can do to Improve Memory (and Why It Deteriorates in Old Age): Is there anything we can do besides “exercise like crazy, eat healthy foods that you don’t like all that much, pop your statin pills, and take up yoga?” Yes: focus, focus, focus, suggests Dr. Bill Klemm.

Where does the “Feeling of Knowing” comes from?: Dr. Ginger Campbell shares some insights from her recent interview with neurologist Robert Burton (author of On Being Certain: Believing You Are Right Even When You’re Not). “While it might be true that one can learn to become more aware of the emotional signals coming from one’s body, Dr. Burton argues that “gut feelings” or intuition should not be assumed to be true without testing.”

 

Alvaro will be speaking at Corporate Learning: Trends and Innovation in mid-November. That’s the free, online, weeklong, alternative event on the future of learning that’s being sponsored by George Siemens, Tony Karrer, and Internet Time Group. 

 


Related post: Brains are applesauce

Ecologies of learning

New structures and spaces of learning: The systemic impact of connective knowledge, connectivism, and networked learning

While this brilliant paper from George Siemens deals with schools and universities, it applies equally well to corporate learnscaping. First we create our habits (in this case, classrooms), and then our habits shape us. Here are a few choice morsels.

Limitless dimensions of learning

In addition to formal education, learning occurs through games and simulations, mentoring and apprenticing, performance support at the point of a learning need, self-learning that arises through critical and creative thinking, communities of practice and personal learning networks, as well as the many informal learning situations that arise through conferences, reading, volunteering, and hobbies. A future model of learning must embrace the broad-spectrum of learning situations and recognizes the value of different modes of cognitive and social development that arise outside of institutional structures.

Moving away from hierarchy and classrooms

…a classroom is a physically-bounded space that, again, by its design, suggests a certain view of learning. Learning is seen as bounded, structured, managed by a single expert (the teacher), and occurring within the confines of a small group of peers. In contrast, the internet can be seen as an ecology of learning with different affordances. For example, the internet, with its emphasis on openness and diversity, challenges the classroom conception of authority and expertise. The structured approach of information filtered in advance, by the educator, and presented in a fairly coherent form defines classrooms. In contrast, the internet is a hub of creative chaos. Educationally, the challenge is one of defining the type of ecology that will permit the formation of the broadest array of networks and communities to address the desired learning tasks and outcomes. The concern is not with structure itself, but rather with the assumption that structure is required across all spaces of learning. If ecologies are the spaces of learning, then networks are the structures of learning. Networks do not occur in a vacuum. They arise in a space that both supports and confines their creation.

If you’re not familiar with George’s work on connectivism, and you should be, here it is in a nutshell:

The centrality of networks as an organizing scheme is also reflected in education, teaching, and learning (Siemens, 2006) under the concept of connectivism. Connectivism is essentially the assertion that knowledge is networked and distributed, and the act of learning is the creation and navigation of networks. The distributed nature of knowledge and the growing complexification of all aspects of society require increased utilization of technology to assist our ability to stay current, manage information abundance, and solve highly complex problems.

Concluding thoughts

Education is not an end in itself. Education will continue to develop as the central element in preparing individuals and societies to participate in the information and knowledge age. The critical challenges facing humanity are many. A highly connected and well educated populace appears to hold the greatest prospect for meeting these challenges.

Education is concerned with the act of becoming. As with classical Greek educational objectives, learning assists individuals in coming to understand the world, to contemplate worthy and significant ideas and concepts, or, as conceived in a liberal arts education, learning is the process of coming to understand the world broadly and from many perspectives in order to see one’s role in advancing the needs related to ethics and humanity. While this need has been well-served by traditional education, the forces of technological change, new opportunities to create and share information, and increased ability for interact with peers globally require a new model based on networks and ecologies. The current age should be one of throwing open doors of learning to bring as many potential contributors to our future as possible.

From workplace courses to global conversations

Nancy White has posted a wonderful summary of the way learning is changing in the world. Co-authored with Josien Kapma, the article demystifies communities of practice.

Social interaction provides the context for learning. Our learning is not mandated, it is voluntary…. We participate because we can and we want to improve our practice and we want to produce value for our community. With today’s technologies, we have both global potential and impact. We can tap into a broader set of skills, work with a wider set of perspectives and really work with a unique edge that is valued by ourselves and our organizations.

Nancy and Josien break out six success factors. We’ve been drinking the same KoolAid, for these are major themes of what I call Learnscape Architecture.

From training and classes to communities and personal learning

Our organizational members and employees can no longer be sufficiently served by formalized internal training. The personal background and learning styles of employees are diverse, as are their job-contexts. This determines what and how people learn. More critically, much of what needs to be learned is ever-changing. It is moving faster than we can create structured learning opportunities. While traditional training methods are still useful for repeatable and repetitive tasks (i.e. learning a new software program, manufacturing, safety procedures) many training needs are about evolving practices such as marketing using social media, cross-organizational collaboration or responding to emerging markets. Informal and voluntary learning becomes a key strategy to move faster than we can accommodate with formally constructed training initiatives.
From expert-led to peer-driven social learning

…A new generation of Internet based tools (often called ‘web.2.0′ or ’social networking’) allow individuals to build a unique online presence and profile including what they know; and, they facilitate connections between individual users, allowing each user to build a personal network around a knowledge area. People can find, trace and track others who share the same interest, even if it is very specific, creating a group of knowledgeable peers, and learn with them. They don’t have to wait for the expert.

The millennial generation has far less interest in authority or being “taught.” They learn with and from each others. As HR managers prepare for the future, training efforts must respond to this culture shift. Instead of connecting employees with a small defined set of experts, you help them tap into networks of expertise.
From formal associations to communities and loose networks

People flock together without the need for a mediating organisation. Instead of formal “expert” associations, loose “peer” networks are emerging. The resulting groups can be highly effective learning opportunities. We are used to team collaboration, communities and networks can add extra ‘layers’ to collaboration. Millions of people are gaining experience with these “new ways of learning”, but mostly in the hobby spheres, like sharing music or tips on travel. A great potential for more job-related, productive uses is waiting to be exploited.
From behind the firewall to beyond the firewall

The dramatic drop of costs of ICT (server space, memory, user hardware, bandwidth etc), combined with improved access and usability have transformed information scarcity to information overload. Control over sources of information or channels of communication is no longer the privilege of few. Before, the boss signed letters and the PR department made sure all corporate communications were checked for quality. Now organizations have to deal with the fact that they can no longer keep track of, let alone control all the communications flowing out of the organization. Maybe it doesn’t matter all that much, as what others say or write about the organization is at least as, if not more, important than formal company messages. In this new reality, not secrecy and walls, but transparency, openness, and compatibility with others, are determinants for success. This counts for learning and talent management as well. As people flow in and out of jobs and organizations; they form their personal networks and portfolio (which often span multiple organizations) along the way. The professional and personal, formal and informal increasingly get intertwined. Recognizing the role of these other communities and networks is a prerequisite for organizational vigor. Ignore them, and your talent will either be limited, or gone.


Addressing broader motivations

People’s motivations to contribute go beyond a paycheck or a demand from the boss. Identity and relevance of the job, feeling they are making a useful contribution as well as working on personal development and social capital, are important. You can’t control people; instead you can empower them. Personal motivation is also a prerequisite for innovation — one organization alone and classic knowledge transfer in itself are no longer sufficient for sustainable innovation in an ever more complex and interdependent world. Innovation requires connections and stimulation beyond the people in our organizations. So tapping into the motivations of employees to participate in the larger world is something else to consider.


From the Big Mouth to the Big Ear

With the advent of Web 2.0 the model for communication has been turned upside down. The “former audience” is now just as much a broadcaster as any large organization. The incredible abundance of information and communication has two effects. First, it created an attention scarcity and media fragmentation. Compared to before, our messages need to be very relevant or audiences filter them out. So instead of talking louder to unfocused audiences, now organizations need to engage in meaningful dialogue with relevant partners. Second, it created an immense pool of searchable communications among others. This buzzing universe of linked sites and blogs is an incredibly rich source of organizational information and learning… if we know how to listen. Organizations need to listen to conversations about them, niches or needs they can fill, feedback and suggestions for improving what they do. It is about tagging and remixing and mapping the network of relationships, looking for where to respond, and where to catalyze action. It is a little bit like listening to the universe.

These tasks can’t be done by an individual. They require the diverse “ears” of communities, the wider net of networks, seeking to make connections between people that advance our organization’s learning and goals. If all your employees are part of the Big Ear, you are ahead.

I really, really, really want to read the forthcoming book on communities of practice that Nancy, John Smith, and Etienne Wenger have been writing for the past four and a half years. Rumor has it that it’s coming soon.

Un-book conversation wrap-up

Today a small group of us conversed about the concept of the un-book.

The un-book attempts to overcome some of the limitations of traditional books: long lead time, content frozen in time, author cannot learn from audience, and more. Here’s a recording of the session,

Slideshare presentation

Back channel Skype discussion

Recording of conversion: wav, m4a


Related post: Dawn of the Un-book

Meta-learning

Chapter 6 of Informal Learning: Rediscovering the Natural Pathways that Inspire Innovation and Performance, by Jay Cross

 

 Meta-Learning

 

Everyone takes the limits of his own vision for the limits of the world. Arthur Schopenhauer

A knowledge worker needs one thing only: to learn how to learn.  Peter F. Drucker.

 

META-LEARNING TREATS LEARNING AS A PROCESS. 

     Learning is a skill, like playing golf. The more you practice, the better your performance, but if golfers followed the pattern of business people learning, they would arrive for a match without ever having thought about the game or touched a club. Hence, meta-learning begins with raising awareness of learning, listening for feedback, praising advancement, and getting lots of practice. This is how one learns to learn.

     Meta-learning also embraces a variety of conditions that interfere with the learning process, such as mismatch of the form of learning and the maturity of the learner. The commitment of the learner is involved, for without it the doors to the mind slam shut. People need the communication skills to participate in the knowledge economy. Stress and poor health are frequent obstacles to learning. All these factors and more are under the meta-learning umbrella.

Full text (pdf)

Additional chapters from Informal Learning

Un-book dialog, tomorrow

Here’s a short presentation for those who are curious about the unbook:
http://www.slideshare.net/dgray_xplane/the-unbook-presentation

I really, really, really envy my pal Dave Gray’s ability to express thoughts visually.

The Un-book

Wednesday, August 27, 2008
10:30 PDT, 1:30 EDT

Conference Dial-in Number: (712) 432-1601
Save phone charges by using Skype to call in.

Participant Access Code: 391096#

Have questions you want addressed? Leave a comment here. Or on the wiki.

Learning Conversations home page

Learnscape Architecture un-book morphs

My Un-book Learnscape Architecture is no more. After spending a couple of days talking with a Fortune 50 firm about their learning ecosystem, I concluded that Learnscape Architecture was too intellectual and snooty. People just want to get stuff done.

So I re-crafted the un-book to address more practical matters. It’s now titled Learnscaping. I’ve added sections on how to assess organizational readiness and think about cost-justification. I chopped out pages that lacked oomph. I added pages to the accompanying Cloud (the online component).

The price for the former un-book was $20 hardcopy, $40 softcopy. Half bought the former; half bought the latter. I bumped the price of the new hard copy to $25 and cut the online price to $37.50 just to see what happens.

For heaven’s sakes, buy it before it morphs into something entirely different.

From the back cover:

Industrial age workers used machinery to manufacture objects in factories. Now, knowledge workers create value, not on the factory floor, but in what I call learnscapes. A learnscape is the platform where knowledge workers collaborate, solve problems, converse, share ideas, brainstorm, learn, relate to others, talk, explain, communicate, conceptualize, tell stories, help one another, teach, serve customers, keep up to date, meet one another, forge partnerships, build communities, and distribute information. Learnscapes are where and how modern work is performed — including workplace learning.

Historically, platforms for learning have been happenstance affairs, a rippled reflection of the organizational culture. The learnscape architect nudges the platform to help it evolve into an environment that is coherent, balanced, natural, connected, and interoperable. Learnscape architects sculpt flexible, loosely-coupled frameworks for learning. They rise above events to manipulate the connections in processes.

Learnscaping is a handbook for learnscape architects.


Internet Time Ecosystem BlogCommunityFeedsKeepersWikiAboutContactSite Map  Informal  BlogRef
Clicky Web Analytics